BAAQMD to BAAD

Follow Marin Events

• Home • Up • OneBayAreaGrant $382 million • Plan_Bay_Area-Overview • PBA Workshops • $20 BILLION on Bay Area Transportation • Solution to Overdevelopment • 19th Ave Freeway Tunnel • Lawsuit against "Plan Bay Area" • CIVIC CENTER PDA Q&A • LA Transit Orientated Development • Bay/cox to mtc detailed comments 20130514.pdf • Bay/Randal O'Toole comment letter.pdf • SF Transit Hub or 19th Ave Tunnel? • Marin Regional Planning Initiatives • Removing a PDA • Suit Sierra Club • BAAQMD to BAAD •
•  •

the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's
 name change to the "Bay Area Air District.

Briefing Document: Bay Area Air District Rebranding

Date: October 26, 2023 from 172 Comments on the  name change post

Subject: Analysis of Public Reaction to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's Rebranding

Introduction:

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) recently announced a rebranding initiative, changing its name to the "Bay Area Air District" and introducing a new logo.
This document summarizes the public reaction to this change, primarily based on a comment section following the announcement.
The response is overwhelmingly negative, focusing on concerns about:

  •  wasted taxpayer money,
  •  perceived overreach by the agency, and
  •  the seemingly unfortunate acronym of the new name, "BAAD."

Key Themes & Ideas:

  1. Negative Reaction to Name Change and Logo:
  • The most prominent theme is the widespread disapproval of the name change and new logo. Many commenters see it as a frivolous waste of taxpayer money.
  • Quote: "Your tax dollars being thrown out the window. Think of the breeze as your money being tossed into the air."
  • Quote: "Such a joke. Waste of taxpayers money. This is exactly one of the reasons why the country voted the other way in the last election."
  • The change is perceived as unnecessary, particularly given other pressing issues.
  • Quote: "Spend money on wild fire prevention or spend it on a logo? I vote fire prevention."
  • The new name lacks the emphasis on "quality," which is seen as problematic.
  • Quote: "Why was the operative word 'quality' removed? Sorry, someone at BAAQMD is clueless."
  • Quote: "Yup, the quality is left out."
  1. "BAAD" Acronym Concerns:
  • The new name creates the acronym "BAAD," which is widely seen as a symbol of the agency's poor decision-making or even its negative impact. Many commenters consider it ironic or fitting.
  • Quote: "Ironic the acronym for the Air Quality District is now BAAD.... ??"
  • Quote: "They failed the acronym test… they are now BAAD."
  • Quote: "And none of the bureaucrat morons realized they just labeled their own bureaucracy BAAD."
  1. Distrust of Government Agencies:
  • A strong undercurrent of distrust toward government agencies in general, and the Bay Area Air District in particular, is apparent in the comments.
  • Quote: "This is exactly one of the reasons why the country voted the other way in the last election. Equity, progressiveness, environmental justice are all buzz words for the permission to allow the government into more aspects of your lives"
  • Quote: "You're soon to be obsolete anyway and the majority of us can't wait to see you go."
  • Many perceive the agency as overreaching and imposing unnecessary regulations that negatively impact residents.
  • Quote: "equity, progressiveness, environmental justice are all buzz words for the permission to allow the government into more aspects of your lives"
  • Quote: "unless the new representative government takes away everything near and dear to you."
  • Some comments explicitly label the organization as a "terrorist organization" and say they are "useless".
  • Quote: "Should be considered a terrorist organization!"
  • Quote: "Oh look a useless California govt agency that loves to flex on our state citizens has a new logo. How cute. Now go away."
  1. Concerns about Regulations and Mandates:
  • Commenters are worried about potential mandates to replace gas appliances with electric ones. They view these as costly and impractical, particularly in existing homes, also saying it will put a strain on the power grid.
  • Quote: "natural gas has negligible impact on air quality. The dictatorship will hurt mostly low income and middle class condo owners: try to get new electric"
  • Quote: "going all electric will place such a demand on the Bay Area electric grid, it may collapse or we will have rolling blackouts."
  • Quote: "I have right to keep my natural gas appliances and if the unelected government officials mandate I replace it with electric at a cost of $25K just for increase PGE service and replacing EP plus rewiring, plus closing walls, plus painting over, plus buying new appliances, then they are welcome to pay for it."
  • Quote: "It costs a small fortune to switch from natural gas to electric."
  1. Debate Over Environmental Issues:
  • There is some debate on climate change, with some commenters dismissing the urgency and blaming wildfires rather than gas appliances.
  • Quote: "Nothing destroys air quality and has serious impact on the green gasses as wild fires, not gas powered household appliances."
  • Some commenters are dismissive of the science around climate change, and call it a political ploy.
  • Quote: "No, there is no scientific consensus. If you do some research, you’ll find that people that are not scientists nor meteorologist nor qualified to even give an opinion were weighing in on so-called man-made global warming. It is purely political."
  • Some individuals defend the agency's efforts to improve air quality, citing cleaner air compared to previous decades.
  • Quote: "Yeah, the air is far far cleaner in the Bay Area than it was 30 or 40 years ago. As I said, clueless."
  1. Criticism of "Spare the Air" Days:
  • The "Spare the Air" program is criticized as arbitrary and ineffective, with some claiming the agency does not have objective measures to call a spare the air day, and is "subjective".
  • Quote: "Better yet, post a quantified schedule of what makes a spare the air day rather than being so subjective."
  • The elimination of the free BART benefit on "Spare the Air" days is also mentioned as an example of the agency's inconsistency.
  • Quote: "They lost my compliance when they deleted the free BART benefit when they declared a spare the air day. You can’t have it both ways."
  1. The Problem With The System
  • There is a general feeling that the agency is full of un-elected officials and that the regulations they are making are costing people a lot of money.
  • Quote: "Objectively, the more unelected regulatory agencies are involved, the more bang you lose from your buck."
  • Quote: "They use sledgehammers to swat flies, and double-charge it for it."
  • Quote: "The scientific consensus is clear. If you can disprove it, your Nobel prize awaits. You can't."
  1. Few Positive Reactions:
  • There are a small number of positive comments, with some praising the agency's mission and the new logo's design, but these are overwhelmed by negativity.
  • Quote: "Great improvement! Very nice!"
  • Quote: "Love it! Previous version looked so old."
  • One commenter says that the new branding helps them in their job.
  • Quote: "As someone who uses your name, the branding change helps me."

Conclusion:

The rebranding of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District to the "Bay Area Air District" has been met with significant public backlash.
The primary concerns revolve around:

  •  the perceived waste of taxpayer money,
  •  the unfortunate "BAAD" acronym,
  •  distrust of government agencies,
  •  fears of costly and impractical mandates, and
  •  criticism of the agency's inconsistent and subjective policies.

The agency appears to have underestimated the level of public frustration and discontent.
This overwhelmingly negative reaction highlights the need for the Bay Area Air District to re-evaluate its communication strategy and potentially engage with the community to address their concerns effectively, rather than just changing their logo and name.

Quiz

Answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences each.

  1. What was the original name of the agency before the rebranding?
  2. What are the stated core values guiding the Bay Area Air District?
  3. What is one of the main criticisms of the agency’s name change expressed in the comments?
  4. According to some commenters, what is a major issue related to the Bay Area’s push for all-electric appliances?
  5. What does the acronym “BAAD,” which some people are using to refer to the agency, stand for?
  6. What is one reason some people say the Bay Area Air District should not be spending money on rebranding?
  7. What alternative issues are some people suggesting the Bay Area Air District should focus on instead of rebranding?
  8. According to one commenter, what actions by the Bay Area Air District led to a loss of compliance?
  9. What do some commenters suggest are a positive aspect of allowing comments on the announcement?
  10. What does one commenter say they appreciate about the Bay Area Air District?

Answer Key

  1. The agency was originally called the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. It changed its name to the Bay Area Air District. The change seems to have been made in order to reflect a shift in their focus.
  2. The core values guiding the Bay Area Air District are collaboration, equity, and innovation. These values are intended to inform the agency’s efforts in promoting clean air and environmental justice.
  3. One of the main criticisms of the agency’s name change is that it is a waste of taxpayer money. Commenters believe the agency should focus on its core mission rather than cosmetic changes.
  4. A major issue related to the push for all-electric appliances is that the Bay Area’s electrical grid may not be able to handle the increased demand. This could potentially lead to blackouts and other problems.
  5. The acronym “BAAD” stands for “Bay Area Air District” or a synonym of “bad” as a way of criticizing the change by others. The acronym is seen by many as a humorous or telling accident that reflects the perceived incompetence of the agency.
  6. Some people argue that the Bay Area Air District should not be spending money on rebranding because there are more pressing issues. They believe funds should be used to combat wildfires and improve actual air quality.
  7. Some commenters suggest the Bay Area Air District should focus on issues such as wildfire prevention, fining polluters, and improving actual air quality. These are considered more important than the name change.
  8. One commenter mentions that the agency’s decision to remove the free BART benefit on spare-the-air days resulted in a loss of compliance. This action created a sense that they agency was not consistent with its values.
  9. Some commenters say that allowing comments is a positive aspect as many government agencies don’t do that. They also view it as the minimum expectation.
  10. One commenter says they are appreciative of the Bay Area Air District’s work and the measurable results that have been achieved. They indicate that they work with the agency by name.

Essay Questions

Consider the following essay questions, formulating your responses based on the source material.

  1. Analyze the various perspectives on the Bay Area Air District’s name change, including the reasons for support and opposition, and what it suggests about the agency's relationship with the public.
  2. Discuss the interplay between environmental concerns, economic considerations, and governmental regulation as presented in the comments, focusing on the issues of natural gas appliances and electric power demands.
  3. Explore the implications of the Bay Area Air District's rebranding in the context of government accountability and the responsible use of public funds, considering public response to the change.
  4. Evaluate the different arguments made by commenters regarding the efficiency and effectiveness of government agencies. Does public opinion in the document lean more towards or away from government action?
  5. Consider the role of comments and public engagement in shaping public perception, especially in the context of agencies like the Bay Area Air District. In other words, how do people communicate with the agency, and what are the perceived results?

Glossary of Key Terms

Bay Area Air District (BAAD): The new name of the agency formerly known as the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Many view the acronym BAAD as an unintended, negative label.

Environmental Justice: The fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.

Equity: In this context, equity refers to fairness and equal access to clean air and environmental protections for all communities in the Bay Area.

Innovation: A stated value of the Air District, it refers to the agency's efforts to use new ideas and approaches to improve air quality.

Collaboration: A stated value of the Air District, refers to the intention of the agency to work together with various stakeholders to achieve their environmental goals.

Tier Level Compliance: Refers to emission standards set for equipment, such as generators. A higher tier usually means stricter emission controls.

Spare the Air Days: Days when air quality is expected to be unhealthy. People are asked to reduce their activities contributing to air pollution on these days.

Fossil Fuels: Natural fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas, formed from the remains of ancient organisms, that when burned contribute to climate change.

PSPS (Public Safety Power Shutoffs): Planned power outages initiated by utilities to prevent wildfires during periods of high fire risk.

CAP and Trade: A system where an upper limit is placed on emissions, allowing businesses to trade allowances. Often criticized as an ineffective way to lower emissions.

FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions about the Bay Area Air District Rebrand

  1. Why did the Bay Area Air Quality Management District change its name to the Bay Area Air District? The agency rebranded to reflect a "renewed focus on collaboration, equity, and innovation" while maintaining its core mission of clean air and environmental justice. They state the new identity represents both continuity and progress. The "quality management" portion of the name was removed.
  2. What is the general public reaction to the name and logo change? Public reaction has been largely negative. Many commenters view the rebrand as a waste of taxpayer money, especially when the agency has more pressing environmental issues to address. Some also pointed out that the new acronym, "BAAD," is not a positive one. Many comments express skepticism about the true purpose of the agency and its impact on their lives. There are some positive comments, including from people who feel the new logo is an improvement.
  3. How much did the rebrand cost? The exact cost of the rebrand is not stated, but numerous commenters express concern over the expenditure, viewing it as a waste of taxpayer funds that could be better spent on more tangible environmental issues, such as wildfire prevention. There is also concern over the cost of staff time and consulting fees related to the rebranding effort.
  4. What does the removal of "quality" from the name suggest to some people? Some commenters see the removal of "quality" as an indication that the agency is no longer prioritizing air quality improvement. They see it as symbolic of a lack of focus on core issues, and a shift toward more political or bureaucratic objectives.
  5. How does the public view the agency's efforts towards environmental protection and regulation? There is a wide range of opinions. Some commenters recognize the past successes of the agency in improving air quality and support its mission. However, a significant portion feels the agency has become overly regulatory and is imposing costly mandates that negatively impact residents, particularly those with lower incomes. There are concerns about regulations mandating the replacement of natural gas appliances with electric ones, citing cost and potential strain on the power grid.
  6. What are some specific concerns about the agency's regulations? Concerns include the potential for increased costs due to required appliance upgrades, the lack of consideration for existing infrastructure, and the impact on classic car owners. There is also criticism of the agency's "Spare the Air" day declarations, seen as subjective and arbitrary. Some fear these regulations will lead to power grid issues and rolling blackouts, and feel the government is overstepping its bounds in mandating specific technologies.
  7. What is the debate around natural gas and electric appliances? There is a strong divide regarding the push to eliminate natural gas appliances. Those in favor argue it aligns with climate change goals. Conversely, opponents cite the high cost of switching to electric, potential strains on the grid, the reliability of gas during outages, and the impact on individuals' finances. Some suggest that wildfires, rather than household appliances, are a greater source of air pollution.
  8. Are there broader political undertones in the public commentary about the agency? Yes, many comments express distrust of government agencies, especially those perceived as unelected and regulatory. Some suggest the agency is part of a larger political agenda that encroaches on individual freedoms. Commenters express concern about what they view as the increasing influence of the government in their lives and a waste of taxpayer money on "frivolous" rebranding efforts when real world issues should be addressed. There is also concern about the trend of mandating technologies and products without appropriate consideration of their cost and implementation.

The NotebookLM Podcast

BAAD on

• OneBayAreaGrant $382 million • Plan_Bay_Area-Overview • PBA Workshops • $20 BILLION on Bay Area Transportation • Solution to Overdevelopment • 19th Ave Freeway Tunnel • Lawsuit against "Plan Bay Area" • CIVIC CENTER PDA Q&A • LA Transit Orientated Development • Bay/cox to mtc detailed comments 20130514.pdf • Bay/Randal O'Toole comment letter.pdf • SF Transit Hub or 19th Ave Tunnel? • Marin Regional Planning Initiatives • Removing a PDA • Suit Sierra Club • BAAQMD to BAAD •    
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to Info@marincounty.info  
Last modified: Monday December 30, 2024.